Implementing New Capital Base Requirement for Nigerian Banks: A Strategic Shift

  • Home
  • Q4 2024
  • Implementing New Capital Base Requirement for Nigerian Banks: A Strategic Shift

The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) recently introduced a new capital base requirement for Nigerian banks. This move has sparked discussions and debates within the banking sector and among stakeholders. This article aims to analyse the implications, challenges, and opportunities associated with this new regulation. Through a thorough examination of the banking industry in Nigeria, it will explore the potential impact on financial stability, competition, and innovation within the sector. Additionally, it will discuss strategies that banks can adopt to meet the new capital requirements and thrive in the evolving regulatory landscape.

  • Background of the Nigerian banking sector

The Nigerian banking sector has undergone significant transformations over the past few decades. Historically, banking in Nigeria can be traced back to the colonial era, with the establishment of branches of British banks to facilitate trade and financial transactions. However, it was not until after Nigeria gained independence in 1960 that the banking sector began to evolve more rapidly.

Key milestones in the development of the Nigerian banking sector include:
i. Nationalization and Regulation (1970s-1980s): In the 1970s, the Nigerian government embarked on a policy of indigenization, which led to the acquisition of majority stakes in many foreign-owned banks by Nigerians. Additionally, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) was established in 1959 and gained more regulatory powers in the banking sector during this period.

ii. Bank Consolidation (2000s): In the early 2000s, the Nigerian banking sector underwent a significant consolidation process, aimed at strengthening the financial system and improving the capacity of banks to support economic growth. This consolidation involved mergers and acquisitions, as well as stricter regulatory requirements for banks’ capitalization and operations.

iii. Liberalization and Privatization (1990s-present): The Nigerian government implemented various reforms to liberalize and privatize the banking sector, encouraging competition and foreign investment. This included the issuance of banking licenses to new players, the introduction of Islamic banking, and the establishment of the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE) to facilitate capital market activities.

iv. Technology and Innovation: In recent years, Nigerian banks have increasingly adopted technology and innovation to enhance efficiency, expand access to financial services, and meet the evolving needs of customers. Mobile banking, online payments, and digital lending platforms have become increasingly prevalent, especially with the widespread adoption of smartphones and internet connectivity.

v. Challenges and Regulation: Despite progress, the Nigerian banking sector still faces challenges such as regulatory compliance, asset quality issues, and maintaining stability amidst economic volatility. The CBN plays a crucial role in regulating the sector, implementing policies to address these challenges and ensure the overall health and resilience of the financial system.

The Nigerian banking sector continues to be a key driver of economic growth and development in the country, contributing to financial inclusion, job creation, and infrastructure financing. However, ongoing reforms and investments in technology and human capital are essential to address remaining challenges and sustain the sector’s growth trajectory.

  • Introduction of the new capital base requirement
    In response to evolving global financial landscapes and the need to fortify the stability and resilience of its banking sector, Nigeria has recently introduced a new capital base requirement for its banks. This strategic shift aims to enhance the sector’s capacity to absorb shocks, foster growth, and align with international best practices. This introduction delves into the rationale behind this initiative and its potential implications for the Nigerian banking industry.

The decision to revise capital base requirements stems from a multifaceted analysis of the Nigerian banking sector’s dynamics, both domestic and international. Key factors driving this initiative include:

i. Enhanced Stability: Strengthening capital requirements bolsters the resilience of banks against financial crises and economic downturns. By maintaining higher capital buffers, banks are better positioned to absorb losses, reducing the likelihood of systemic risk.

ii. Global Alignment: Nigerian authorities recognize the importance of aligning the country’s banking regulations with international standards prescribed by bodies like the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Adhering to globally accepted capital adequacy norms enhances Nigeria’s standing in the international financial community, fostering investor confidence and facilitating cross-border operations.

iii. Support for Growth and Innovation: A robust capital base provides banks with the financial wherewithal to pursue strategic initiatives, such as expanding lending activities to critical sectors, investing in technological advancements, and fostering innovation. This, in turn, catalyzes economic growth and promotes financial inclusion.

The introduction of a new capital base requirement will likely have several implications for Nigerian banks and the broader financial ecosystem:

i. Capital Infusion: Banks will need to augment their capital reserves to comply with the revised requirements. This may entail various strategies, including raising additional equity, retaining earnings, or restructuring balance sheets. While this might impose short-term financial strains, it fortifies the long-term viability of banks.

ii. Industry Consolidation: Smaller banks or those unable to meet the new capital thresholds may explore consolidation as a means of bolstering their capital positions. Mergers and acquisitions could reshape the competitive landscape, leading to larger, more resilient institutions better equipped to navigate market uncertainties.

iii. Increased Compliance Costs: Adhering to stringent capital regulations necessitates robust risk management frameworks and enhanced regulatory compliance measures. Banks may incur higher operational expenses associated with compliance, including investments in technology, staff training, and regulatory reporting systems.

iv. Credit Availability: Stricter capital requirements could impact banks’ lending capacity, particularly to riskier segments of the economy. While this may mitigate excessive risk-taking, there’s a possibility of credit tightening, potentially affecting businesses and consumers reliant on bank financing.

D. Strategies for Meeting the New Capital Requirement

Meeting new capital requirements imposed by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) can be a significant challenge for banks, but with careful planning and strategic execution, it can be achieved. Here are some strategies that banks in Nigeria could consider:
i. Assessment of Current Capital Position: Banks should start by conducting a thorough assessment of their current capital position to determine the gap between the existing capital and the new requirements. This assessment should include an analysis of retained earnings, equity, and other capital instruments.

ii. Capital Raising: Banks can explore various avenues for raising capital, such as issuing new shares, rights issues, private placements, or convertible bonds. They can also consider seeking investment from institutional investors or strategic partners. Additionally, banks could explore innovative financing options such as Tier 2 capital instruments.

iii. Optimization of Capital Structure: Banks should optimize their capital structure by reallocating resources from low-yield or non-core assets to high-yield assets. This could involve divesting non-core businesses or assets to free up capital for core banking activities.

iv. Profit Retention: Banks can focus on retaining a larger portion of their profits to bolster their capital reserves. This may involve implementing cost-cutting measures, improving operational efficiency, and enhancing revenue generation through cross-selling and up-selling of products and services.

v. Risk Management: Strengthening risk management practices can help banks mitigate potential losses and preserve capital. This includes implementing robust credit risk assessment processes, enhancing liquidity management, and actively managing interest rate and market risks.

vi. Capital Conservation Measures: Banks can implement capital conservation measures such as dividend reduction or suspension to conserve capital in the short term. This can provide a temporary buffer while the bank works on more permanent capital-raising solutions.

vii. Regulatory Compliance: Banks should ensure full compliance with regulatory requirements imposed by the CBN. This includes timely reporting and disclosure of financial information, as well as adherence to prudential regulations and capital adequacy ratios.

viii. Engagement with Regulators: Banks can engage in constructive dialogue with regulatory authorities to seek clarification on the new requirements and to discuss potential challenges or concerns. Building a positive relationship with regulators can facilitate a smoother transition to the new capital regime.

ix. Strategic Planning and Execution: Banks should develop a comprehensive strategic plan for meeting the new capital requirements, including specific milestones and timelines for implementation. Regular monitoring and evaluation of progress against the plan are essential for success.

x. Investor Communication: Clear and transparent communication with shareholders and investors is crucial throughout the process of meeting the new capital requirements. Banks should provide regular updates on their capital-raising efforts and progress towards compliance.

By adopting a combination of these strategies and tailoring them to their specific circumstances, banks in Nigeria can navigate the challenges posed by the new capital requirements imposed by the Central Bank of Nigeria.

E.   Future outlook for the banking sector in Nigeria with the enhanced capital base

Enhancing the capital base in the Nigerian banking sector could have several implications for its outlook:
i. Increased Stability: A stronger capital base typically means banks are better able to weather economic downturns or financial shocks. This could enhance overall stability in the banking sector, reducing the likelihood of bank failures or systemic crises.

ii. Better Risk Management: With more capital at their disposal, banks may be able to allocate resources more effectively towards risk management practices. This could lead to improved underwriting standards, better assessment of credit risks, and overall, more prudent lending practices.

iii. Enhanced Competitiveness: Banks with stronger capital bases may be in a better position to compete both domestically and internationally. They may have more capacity to invest in technology, expand their product offerings, and pursue growth opportunities.

vi. Regulatory Compliance: Enhancing the capital base could be a response to regulatory requirements or expectations. Meeting these standards could lead to improved relationships with regulators and a reduced risk of sanctions or penalties.

v. Increased Investor Confidence: A stronger capital base may attract investors looking for stable and reliable returns. This could lead to increased investment in the banking sector, providing banks with additional funds for growth and expansion.

Enhancing the capital base in the Nigerian banking sector has the potential to improve stability, competitiveness, and investor confidence. However, it’s important for banks to carefully manage the transition to ensure a smooth and sustainable future.

  • Conclusion
    The implementation of a new capital base requirement marks a pivotal juncture for Nigeria’s banking sector, signalling a commitment to fortify financial stability and align with global standards. While the transition may pose challenges in the short term, the long-term benefits in terms of enhanced resilience, investor confidence, and sustainable growth are substantial. Nigerian banks must proactively adapt to these regulatory changes, embracing innovation, strengthening risk management practices, and fostering strategic partnerships to thrive in an increasingly competitive and dynamic landscape.


Atmel, D., Barnes C., Panetta, F. and Salleo, C. (2020). Consolidation and Efficiency in the Financial Sector; A review of international evidence, Journal of Banking and Finance, 28(10).

A Review of Market Performance in 2010 and the outlook for 2011 (2010), “The Nigerian Stock Exchange” pp. 26.

Abolo, Emmanuel M. (2018), “The Nigerian Banking Industry and Cross Border Transactions Post consolidation” Executive Seminar for Central Bank of Nigeria Executives.

Abreu, M. and V. Mendes (2021). “Commercial Bank interest margins and profitability: Evidence from E.U countries”, Porto, Working paper series, Available at:

Aburime, T. and C.U. Uche (2021). “Impact of share capitalization on bank profitability in Nigeria”, European Journal of Scientific Research, 19(3), 438–452.

Ariccia, D. G. and R. Marquez (2022). “Information and Bank Credit Allocation”, Journal of Financial Economics, 72(1), 185-214. 

Bank of International Settlements (2019). Implementation of Basel II: Practical Consideration. Basel Committee on Bank Supervision. BIS Publication.

Bank of International Settlements (2023). “Basel Committee Reaches Agreement on new capital Issue”, Business releases 10.

Bosede, A.F., O. Olowe, and O. Uwuigbe (2022). “Returns on Investment of Deposit Money Banks (DMBs) in Nigeria”, Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 3(3), 195-206.

Circular to All commercial, Merchant and Noninterest Banks and promoters of proposed Banks by Financial Policy and Regulation Department Central Bank of Nigeria 28th March 2024.

 Central Bank of Nigeria (2010). Measurement of capital adequacy along international standard. Lagos: CBN Publications.

Ezike, J. E. and M. O. Oke (2013). “Capital Adequacy Standards, Basel Accord and Bank Performance: The Nigerian Experience (A Case Study of Selected Banks in Nigeria)”, Asian Economic and Financial Review, 3(2), 146-159.

Financial System Strategy, FSS 2020 (2008), “Capital Market” International Conference, Abuja.

Jennings S. (2007), “The Road to Success: Nigeria’s Capital Markets” Speech delivered at Nigerian Stock Exchange Conference, London.

 Okonjo-Iweala N. and Osafo-Kwaako P. (2007). “Nigeria’s Economic Reforms: Progress and Challenges” Brookings Global Economy and Development.

Olisaemeka, A.G. (2009), “The Meltdown of the Nigerian Capital Market: Causes and Consequences” Nigerians Report for the benefit of Nigeria and the rest of the world.

Oni, Samuel A. (2009), ‘The Regulatory Challenges of Cross-Border Baking in An Era of Post Banking Consolidation in Nigeria” Executive Seminar for Central Bank of Nigeria Executives.

Federal Government of Nigeria (1991), Banks and Other Financial Institutions Act

(BOFIA) 1991. Lagos: Government Press Limited.

Mayowa, Oludare (2006, January 23-29). CBN releases new rules on Community

Banking, hikes Capital base. Business Times.

NSE, Joshua (2006, January 5). Insurance Industry’s Consolidation Scheme: The story so

far. The Guardian.

NSE, Joshua (2006, January 12). Recapitalization of Nigeria’s Insurance Firms and the

Continental Market Question. The Guardian.

Written by

Onwuemele Sunday Emeke, CFE

Head Office Audit

United Bank for Africa Plc.

Leave A Comment

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive latest news, updates, promotions, and special offers delivered directly to your inbox.
No, thanks